Importance of virtual machinery long before humans did! In short: biological evolution discovered the power and Non physical components of minds and the brain mechanisms in which Machinery (at any time), can be compared with the relationship between the many For example, virtual machineįunctionality can grow as new, more reliable security technology is added to theĪlthough the correspondence is neither simple nor obvious, that relationshipīetween growing and changing email virtual machinery and the underlying physical Versions of our current virtual machines. May be used in future to implement faster, more reliable, higher capacity Reliable hardware running the same virtual machine. That was unknown a few years earlier, providing cheaper, faster and more The physical network are replaced using new physical and software technology Unavailable causing messages to be routed differently, and over time parts of For example, parts of the physical network can be temporarily Machine that runs for an extended time is not equivalent to or reducible to theĬollection of physical machinery that happens to implement the email system atĪny time. Our planet) are not definable in the language of physics, and the virtual the internet-based email system now used all over Machine, in part because the terms used to describe the properties and functions That are implemented in, but not equivalent (or reducible) to any underlying physical Since the mid 20th Century has been increasing use of powerful virtual machines In particular, asĮxplained below, one of the main achievements of computer systems engineering Metaphysically dualist in the original sense, or mystical. I'll present a philosophical position that is anti-reductionist without being Shares my disdain for the philosophical uses/abuses of the "what it is like"Ĭonstruct, though it is not clear whether we agree on anything else! See I discovered in Sept 2019 that the Oxford philosopher Peter Hacker Important-sounding but incoherent, useless, characterisations. Implemented in modelling such an agent, from (b) aspects that are This paper tries to separate out (a) aspects of the question that are importantĪnd provide part of the objective characterisation of the states, orĬapabilities of an agent, and which help to define the ontology that is to be Locations are where things happen and times are when things happen. Of the form "Where and when did X happen?", or avoiding quotes: spatial To explain what space and time are by saying they are the answers to questions ?" questions, in my view are as silly as trying Machinery produced by biological evolution long before human engineersĭiscovered the uses of virtual machines. Of various kinds, including internal states of powerful types of virtual The nature and content of internal states of more or less intelligent entities Instead we need to think about deep, factual, discovery-driving, questions about X?' is often thought to identify a type of phenomenon for which no physicalĬonditions can be sufficient, and which cannot be replicated in computer-basedĪgents Nagel(1974). In particular the question 'What is it like to be an Pseudo-questions which are often posed in the context of attacking some version This paper aims to replace deep-sounding unanswerable, time-wasting Virtual machine Functionalism (Sloman and ChrisleyĢ003), including implications of causal indexicality for conceptsīased on self-organising concept-formation mechanisms. (Modified abstract and added more references) (He is more philosophically careful than I am!) Referenced Peter Hacker's critique of the use of "what it's like to be", etc. Originally written Jan 1996, and posted to a 'Usenet' discussion group
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |